I am not a lawyer, nor do I pretend to be anything of the sort. However, I would like to impart a nugget of legal advice to Mr. Brian McNamee..... Stick to your story! According to the deposition Brian McNamee gave during the Mitchell Report, he injected Roger Clemens with steroids and HGH approximately 16 - 21 times from 1998 - 2001. Then McNamee claims that he injected Roger's wife with steroids at his request. Then he has photos of used syringes, and empty beer cans that have Clemens' DNA. Today, Wednesday February 13, 2008 he claims that he actually administered steroids and HGH more than he originally reported. Roger Clemens doesn't need a team of lawyers to defend himself, and his wife. He's got Brian McNamee!
Brian McNamee seems to be a discrediting himself the longer this plays out. If you want people to believe what you say, your story should have consistency. Brian McNamee's story consistently changes. You gave deposition for the Mitchell Report. Why didn't you just give all of this stuff up then? why now?
I really don't see how implicating steroid use by Roger's wife is going to add credibility to his story. It makes you look like an idiot, and people are more inclined to discredit an idiot. As it stands that is speculation, and does nothing to corroborate your allegations that Roger Clemens used steroids.
Then there are the pictures of beer cans, and used needles. Why did you present pictures? Why not the actual syringes, and beer cans? Once again, you open your mouth . You kept the paraphernalia in case Roger Clemens were ever to deny using performance enhancing drugs. If you hadn't said anything, and turned over the evidence for testing this could be over an done with.
Then, before congress this morning you say, "I injected Clemens even more often". It doesn't take a genius to realize that you have now lied under oath. Either you lied to congress today or to George Mitchell.
Your defense team should have advised you to shut up. That is the best piece of legal advice that they could have given you.
Fair and Balanced Reporting:
Hearing Update
What Would Jose Do?
Wednesday, February 13, 2008
Do yourself a favor....
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
2 comments:
How does Andy Petite's testimony add credibility to Brian McNamee's story? Petite claimed that he had only take HGH to recover from an injury. Now he says that he used HGH again in 2004. It just doesn't make any sense to me. No one can keep their story straight.
He must've been listening to you dude, cause it seems like that's just what he did - stick to his story.
PS - none of this matters because:
A. There are currently no charges being brought against either McNamee or Clemens. Hence, no particular implications.
And...
B. Even if there were, there is no admissible evidence to corroborate either story...at least none that would convince a jury that Clemens or McNamee are lying. Twould be a waste of judicial time for sure.
Just my two to three cent opinion.
Post a Comment